Hvor i Harry Potter ville en trold eller heks gå for ikke-magisk sygdom eller skade? [duplikere]

2

Jeg ved, at St. Mungo behandler sygdom og skader forårsaget af magi. Hvad med de skader eller sygdomme, der ikke skyldes magi? Går de til en Muggle-læge eller et hospital til behandling? Eksempel Dumbledore og Harry bærer briller hvor går de og undersøger deres øjne? Jeg ville tro, at guider / hekse var en del, at mennesker ville få Muggle-relaterede sygdomme også.

    
sæt dean1957 10.09.2017 / 18:33

1 svaret

4

De ville bruge grundlæggende magi til at rette dem. Intet længere ophold på hospitalet ville være nødvendigt.

I pondered the issue of illness and disability very early in the creation of Harry's world. Did wizards catch colds? Could they cure illnesses that baffled Muggles? Were there disabled wizards? What were the limits of wizarding medicine, or could it fix anything?

(...)

I decided that, broadly speaking, wizards would have the power to correct or override 'mundane' nature, but not 'magical' nature. Therefore, a wizard could catch anything a Muggle might catch, but he could cure all of it; he would also comfortably survive a scorpion sting that might kill a Muggle, whereas he might die if bitten by a Venomous Tentacula. Similarly, bones broken in non-magical accidents such as falls or fist fights can be mended by magic, but the consequences of curses or backfiring magic could be serious, permanent or life-threatening. This is the reason that Gilderoy Lockhart, victim of his own mangled Memory Charm, has permanent amnesia, why the poor Longbottoms remain permanently damaged by magical torture, and why Mad-Eye Moody had to resort to a wooden leg and a magical eye when the originals were irreparably damaged in a wizards' battle; Luna Lovegood's mother, Pandora, died when one of her own experimental spells went wrong, and Bill Weasley is irreversibly scarred after his meeting with Fenrir Greyback.

Pottermore: Illness and Disability

    
svar givet 10.09.2017 / 18:44